<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why IPv6 might benefit from European and German privacy regulations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kuppingercole.com/kuppinger/2010/03/03/why-ipv6-might-benefit-from-european-and-german-privacy-regulations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kuppingercole.com/kuppinger/2010/03/03/why-ipv6-might-benefit-from-european-and-german-privacy-regulations/</link>
	<description>KuppingerCole</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:52:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Kuppinger</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kuppingercole.com/kuppinger/2010/03/03/why-ipv6-might-benefit-from-european-and-german-privacy-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Kuppinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kuppingercole.com/kuppinger/?p=273#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Sorry - wrong translation. I&#039;ve updated my post.
And yes, it&#039;s highly probable that the Court didn&#039;t even think about IPv6. And, honestly, it is more about this typical &quot;Oh, we can&#039;t do that technically&quot; argument which is just wrong than about the question of whether IPv6 will get a push or not. I just don&#039;t like this fake arguments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8211; wrong translation. I&#8217;ve updated my post.<br />
And yes, it&#8217;s highly probable that the Court didn&#8217;t even think about IPv6. And, honestly, it is more about this typical &#8220;Oh, we can&#8217;t do that technically&#8221; argument which is just wrong than about the question of whether IPv6 will get a push or not. I just don&#8217;t like this fake arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duke</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kuppingercole.com/kuppinger/2010/03/03/why-ipv6-might-benefit-from-european-and-german-privacy-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kuppingercole.com/kuppinger/?p=273#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Sorry to correct your post. It was not the German High Court, but the Federal Constitutional Court which scrapped the German Data Retention Law. Your opinion on the push for IPv6 is interesting, although this was most probably not the Court&#039;s intention. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to correct your post. It was not the German High Court, but the Federal Constitutional Court which scrapped the German Data Retention Law. Your opinion on the push for IPv6 is interesting, although this was most probably not the Court&#039;s intention. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

